Information

Are the spontaneous generation and evolution the same idea but in a different time scale?

Are the spontaneous generation and evolution the same idea but in a different time scale?


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

I was in my biology class, learning the history of spontaneous generation and how this idea was discarded. I told my teacher that is the same as evolution but in a different timeline. I Argue that evolution does not explain how life formed, but complemented by abiogenesis. Ultimately it is almost the same thing. Therefore it could not rule out spontaneous generation.

I got an F.

My appreciation is so wrong?


You are right in the sense the evolutionary biology doesn't try to explain the origin of life as it is not within its scope. Other fields of biology investigate the question of origin of life (abiogenesis).

Now, there is a very important difference between spontaneous generation and evolution. Life originated at some point and the through repetitive speciation events, created the whole diversity of species existing on earth. You could say that what really happens is that there was one spontaneous creation of life (although there is more a continuum from non-living to living things than a sudden switch from non-living to living) out of non-living things.

The main fallacy of spontaneous generation is that under the spontaneous-generation-conceptualization of life, every species are made de novo and independently which is definitely not the case as in reality species speciate (split in two) causing the existence of to two new species. There are tons of fallacies hidden behind the spontaneous generation conception of life, one of which relates to the concept of species and another one is the origin of within population variation.

So, in short spontaneous generation is definitely something different from a single abiogenesis and evolution and the hypothesis of spontaneous generation has been ruled out a long time ago already.

So I am not so much aware of the grading philosophy in your school but your argumentation was wrong and probably the F was worth. Next time, you will probably want to discuss your opinions with your teacher before the test to make sure you agree.


Evolution is about descent with modification. Spontaneous generation doesn't have that. It's about modern organisms emerging from raw molecules. If flies spontaneously appeared from rotting cow meat, why would they have DNA that made them look like they were evolutionarily related to other insects?


Watch the video: The Story of Louis Pasteur and Spontaneous Generation (July 2022).


Comments:

  1. Bellamy

    In my opinion it is obvious. I recommend to look for the answer to your question in google.com

  2. Manuelo

    This is not exactly what I need. Who else can suggest?

  3. Oakley

    On your place I would try to solve this problem itself.

  4. Finan

    You allow the mistake. Enter we'll discuss. Write to me in PM, we will handle it.



Write a message